Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110802
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '19 at 03:04
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 95.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 187 76% 128 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 485 51% 408 Pts	64-Core 491 30% 491 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 22D2) CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.3 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Lighting 27.6 Reflection 33.7 Parallax 35.2 22% 32.2 fps	MRender 32.7 Gravity 26.9 Splatting 36.8 27% 32.1 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 59GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 77 77 78 77 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 88.2 Write 70.7 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 75.9 54% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 65%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 214GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 77 77 78 77 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 65.5 Write 58 Mixed 69 SusWrite 75.9 50% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 410GB free Firmware: CC1H SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 32 36 60 36 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 19 Write 28.2 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 38.8 20% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 96% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 659GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 8.9 9.8 37 9.1 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	5.59% Terrible	Read 4.5 Write 5.7 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 15 5% 7.38 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 5.59% Great: 107%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 89GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 22 22 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 34.8 Write 35.5 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 21.6 23% 30.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 61%
WD My Book 1140 3TB 6,710 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2TB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 28.7 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 18.8 35% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.4% Poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.37 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 56.9 70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	605x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	291x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	88x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	116x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	79x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	308x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	253x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	185x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16