Asus H110M-E/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '19 at 00:36
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 90.7 2-Core 174 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 361 50% 368 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Lighting 37.9 Reflection 30 Parallax 36.8 31% 34.9 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 34.8 30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Deva's SSD-E240e 240GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 175 113 46 51 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 476 Write 381 Mixed 378 SusWrite 114 75% 337 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 0.8 46% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 1.2 46% 110 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 931GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 196 191 190 192 192 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 206 Write 190 Mixed 84.7 SusWrite 192 123% 168 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-023.A00G 9905678-065.A00G 16GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 21.6 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 23.1 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	211x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	186x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	167x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	176x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	167x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	108x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	88x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	27x

RAM
CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x16GBGEILBench 73%, 565 samples	56x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	33x
9905678-023.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 4,415 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16