Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$42 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 182 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 274 36% 272 Pts	64-Core 262 16% 262 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 309F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 4.96 Parallax 4.19 3% 4.22 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 7.7 4% 5.05 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 434GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 691 493 496 494 318 292 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 425GB free Firmware: KC65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 102 102 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 99.8 Write 92.9 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 101 64% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 88%
Samsung S1 Mini 160GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 50GB free, PID 2f04 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 28.9 Mixed 20.1 SusWrite 30.7 37% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 49% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR5030EF68F9W1600 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.6 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16