Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive363% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '19 at 06:10
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 276
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 880
87% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,125
70% 1,125 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 193
Parallax 192
146% 188 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 181
Splatting 128
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
842GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2277 2240 1487 1468 1484 1488 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
363% Outstanding
Read 2,615
Write 2,356
Mixed 1,774
SusWrite 1,741
476% 2,121 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 96
321% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,307
DQ Write 1,056
DQ Mixed 1,144
867% 1,169 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 363%
Great: 410%
WD Blue 1TB-$105
59GB free
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 301 300 299 297 219 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 446
Write 327
Mixed 260
SusWrite 292
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 19.4
97% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 194
176% 270 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
764GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 474 475 475 475 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 467
Mixed 415
SusWrite 474
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 56.7
194% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 358
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
238GB free
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 223 217 217 217 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 941
Write 603
Mixed 573
SusWrite 244
131% 590 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 56.5
202% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 392
348% 526 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 141%
Great: 144%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 185 190 190 190 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 183
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 186
106% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 26.8
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 29.3
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback