Positivo POS-AG31AP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-AG31AP  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-AG31AP
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '19 at 18:11
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 70.5
39% 58.6 Pts
4-Core 73.8
8-Core 79.1
10% 76.4 Pts
64-Core 81.3
5% 81.3 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.2.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 42.5
29% 36.6 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 30.9
Splatting 37.3
27% 32.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
602GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 68 65 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 17.7
Write 56
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 65.4
32% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 42%
Seagate Portable 1TB
733GB free, PID 2332
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 21.5
Write 18.5
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 15.6
26% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 38%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
89GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 29
Write 23.6
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 15.6
30% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.7 5.6 5.4 5.9 5.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 7.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.6
14% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.9
153% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-AG31AP Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-AG31AP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $138
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback