Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5650 13,757 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 97.5 1-Core 101 2-Core 202 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 616 63% 510 Pts	64-Core 760 47% 760 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GTS 2,598 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8241) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.44 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	2.66% Terrible	Lighting 2.77 Reflection 5.65 Parallax 0.97 2% 3.13 fps	MRender 6.38 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 4.43 4% 4.25 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.66% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD Smar tbuy 120GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 48 25 32 28 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 306 Write 207 Mixed 214 SusWrite 44.8 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 24.4 99% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 56.8 DQ Write 49.3 DQ Mixed 108 66% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 83%
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 129GB free Firmware: SAFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 189 121 93 93 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 363 Write 229 Mixed 238 SusWrite 123 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 31.5 109% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 89.5 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 73.4 73% 114 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 23.8 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 14.1 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 48.3 83% 48.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $380

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16