Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '19 at 21:28
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3770-$260
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
61.2% Good
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 193
68% 145 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 520
55% 431 Pts
64-Core 526
35% 526 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$170
CLim: 2176 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.17
Relative performance (0th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 98.7
Parallax 102
5% 67.1 fps
MRender 89.6
Gravity 118
Splatting 94.5
32% 101 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$110
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 326 156 132 114 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 489
Write 445
Mixed 335
SusWrite 171
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 23.8
115% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 40.9
79% 165 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$90
704GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 133 132 130 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 135
Write 130
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 131
74% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
308GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 141 139 135 131 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 174
Write 165
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 136
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$74
2TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 151 148 144 142 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 161
Write 158
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 146
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 98%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$108
589GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 86 86 83 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 87.5
Write 88.8
Mixed 63
SusWrite 86.1
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 103%
Disk drive 1TB
884GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 73 71 69 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26% Poor
Read 64.5
Write 64.5
Mixed 18
SusWrite 71.6
73% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 14,323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $484
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
Intel Core i5-9600K $238Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $288Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $603SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback