Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140226
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateMar 04 '19 at 20:30
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 48.4
2-Core 128
54% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 441
42% 348 Pts
64-Core 444
27% 444 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 191
Parallax 232
107% 185 fps
MRender 249
Gravity 212
Splatting 134
155% 198 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 119%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 54 51 51 54 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 292
Write 70.5
Mixed 95
SusWrite 54
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 22.2
100% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 77.3
DQ Mixed 50.1
65% 122 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 85%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
251GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 137 140 141 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 111
Write 96.8
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 139
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$175
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 173 172 173 173 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
774GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 92 92 89 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 41.3
Write 90.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 91.5
49% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.1
54% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 57%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62
107GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 125 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 178
Write 156
Mixed 115
SusWrite 126
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.5
331% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
348GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 70 67 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 57.7
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 67.8
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $630
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback