HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '19 at 18:50
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	52% Above average	Memory 77 1-Core 40.3 2-Core 81.1 44% 66.1 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 160 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 157 10% 157 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Lighting 38.8 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 37.3 32% 35.4 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 36 30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 167 54 35 44 34 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34% Below average	Read 252 Write 234 Mixed 235 SusWrite 87.2 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 1.1 45% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 45.7 61% 112 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 465GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 175 179 156 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 149 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 172 96% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:07 5D GR1333D364L9/2G ID:07 5D GR1333D364L9/2G ID:07 5D GR1333D364L9/2G ID:07 5D GR1333D364L9/2G 44GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.4% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.4 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	53x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	37x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	26x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	90x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	20x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	17x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:01 98 K1N7HK-HYC 48GBUnknownBench 19%, 8 samples	6x
ID:80 CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 38GBUnknownBench 20%, 147 samples	5x
ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 38GBUnknownBench 19%, 31 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16