User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGBT___ AWRDACPI
MotherboardGigabyte C51-MCP51
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080916
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '19 at 21:13
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+-$50
Socket 7, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 64.4
36% 53.7 Pts
4-Core 64.7
8-Core 64.6
9% 64.6 Pts
64-Core 52
3% 52 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
470GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 80 73 78 80 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 75.8
Write 64.3
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 74.9
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 65%
WD WD20 EVDS-63T3B0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.1 1 1.3 1 0.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
7.65% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 1
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 1.1
6% 7.92 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.58% Terrible
MC Read 1.9
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2
6% 2.17 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback