Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GE
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '19 at 07:23
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 81.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 259
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 785
80% 646 Pts
64-Core 904
56% 904 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 18FE) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9924
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 41.8
36% 39.1 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 35.8
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$82
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1238 1405 1388 1366 531 513 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,657
Write 1,358
Mixed 1,139
SusWrite 1,073
293% 1,307 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 55.3
204% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,320
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 566
548% 881 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 240%
Great: 311%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
552GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 98 100 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 118
Write 64.6
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 100
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
199% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 72%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
107GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 16.2
Mixed 2
SusWrite 24
23% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.3
162% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3B1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.6
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback