PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 8.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | MICRO-STAR MS-7597 |
Motherboard | MSI GF615M-P33 (MS-7597) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110104 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 03 '19 at 00:41 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II X2 255
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
|
46.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
8.19%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 171 169 172 172 170 MB/s
|
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
319GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 126 125 127 127 128 MB/s
|
64.4%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 14h SDRAM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 3x |
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples | 3x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 3x |
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 1x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $111 |