Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateMar 02 '19 at 22:50
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 180
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 464
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.8% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 59.4
56% 66.3 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 68.3
55% 66.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 338 332 315 317 317 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 355
Write 326
Mixed 308
SusWrite 325
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 38.4
124% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 46.6
DQ Write 90.9
DQ Mixed 58.1
47% 65.2 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
83GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 65 63 60 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 88
Write 61.7
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 62.1
49% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 68%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
115GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 74.7
Write 112
Mixed 60.2
109% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.1
78% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.7% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $229
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback