Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '19 at 22:19
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 66%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 87.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 243
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 550
64% 498 Pts
64-Core 683
42% 683 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 35.7
32% 35.4 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 36.6
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,545
Write 1,142
Mixed 470
231% 1,052 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 39.9
173% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 905
DQ Write 763
DQ Mixed 817
617% 828 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
268GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2032 773 774 773 774 775 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2,061
Write 1,963
Mixed 1,489
SusWrite 983
364% 1,624 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 71.6
245% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,331
DQ Write 1,111
DQ Mixed 1,255
930% 1,232 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 273%
Great: 355%
WDC WD10EZEX-08WN4A0 240GB
150GB free
Firmware: SBFM81.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 271 277 277 281 279 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 372
Write 182
Mixed 256
SusWrite 273
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 34.6
134% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 219
183% 263 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.8% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 21
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $926
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback