Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP4 TH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-UP4 TH  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '19 at 21:44
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 193
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 619
62% 503 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 117
Parallax 109
90% 112 fps
MRender 98.3
Gravity 103
Splatting 104
83% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 95 87 107 79 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
61% Good
Read 412
Write 132
Mixed 139
SusWrite 92.2
42% 194 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 21.5
93% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 55.7
90% 181 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61%
Great: 85%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 48 47 104 107 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 88.7
Write 52.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 76.8
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
45% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 83%
Lacie P9233 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 162 161 161 161 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 125
Write 142
Mixed 104
SusWrite 160
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
423% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB
94GB free, PID 022a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 41
Write 40.5
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 41
52% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 37%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
103GB free, PID 0477
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 20.8
Write 19
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 19.7
26% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 123 46 39 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 81.5
112% 85 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2000 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
71.2% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 23.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 20.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-UP4 TH Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP4 TH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $398
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback