Lenovo 10MLA0G9BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10MLA0G9BR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3106
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190121
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 01 '19 at 21:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 241
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 672
64% 527 Pts
64-Core 680
42% 680 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 77 105 165 162 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 63.9
Write 41.5
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 124
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 109%
Generic Mass Storage 4GB
2GB free, PID 6200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.6 6.2 5.2 6.9 6.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 6.7
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 6
10% 9.28 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
47% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMA851U6AFR6N-UHHC 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.9% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.1
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 21.4
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback