Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '19 at 03:09
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 142
57% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 244
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841E) 2GB
CLim: 692 MHz, MLim: 1251 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.81
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 26.5
16% 21.3 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 15.3
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XM11 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 322ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 122 122 123 130 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 292
Write 138
Mixed 172
SusWrite 123
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 29.2
123% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 34.5
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 38
38% 58.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
517GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 1 0.9 1.4 0.5 1.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 95
Write 100
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 0.9
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 57%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 16GB
0GB free, PID 1400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.8 4.2 3.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Read 14.9
Write 2.7
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 2.9
5% 5.57 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.5% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $133
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback