Asus P4C800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P4C800  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20041014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '19 at 20:41
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.06GHz-$120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Memory 37.8
1-Core 33.1
2-Core 37.3
24% 36.1 Pts
4-Core 32.1
8-Core 34.4
4% 33.2 Pts
64-Core 38
2% 38 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.02E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 8.1 22 34 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 22.6
Write 9.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 18.8
10% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
75% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x0.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.38% Terrible
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.8 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 1.7
4% 1.4 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.38%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback