Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '19 at 20:04
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 129
60% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 218
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7990 (CrossFire Disabled)
AMD(1002 0B2A) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Lighting 47.2
Reflection 32
Parallax 64.4
38% 47.9 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 39.8
33% 39.8 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 186 268 196 244 260 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 497
Write 221
Mixed 288
SusWrite 235
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 37.6
118% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 7.3
73% 173 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 128%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
228GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 233 237 239 241 242 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.1% Good
Read 246
Write 236
Mixed 188
SusWrite 234
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 29.9
101% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 61.7
DQ Mixed 83.5
67% 96.4 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
328GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 122 122 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 103
Write 80.9
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 121
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.7% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback