Asrock Z87 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z87 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160412
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '19 at 08:03
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217 8,137 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	78.7% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 107 2-Core 206 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 540 56% 450 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Zotac(19DA 1366) CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.6% Average	Lighting 60.7 Reflection 66.1 Parallax 58.7 49% 61.8 fps	MRender 71.8 Gravity 58.5 Splatting 55.7 50% 62 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 187 149 145 144 145 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 453 Write 391 Mixed 362 SusWrite 165 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 97.3 4K Mixed 57.5 190% 66 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 353 260% 342 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 55GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 283 36 48 43 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Read 449 Write 440 Mixed 388 SusWrite 112 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 95.4 4K Mixed 55.3 181% 63.3 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 245 209% 304 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 126%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 170GB free Firmware: M0CR031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 280 386 396 393 394 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Read 397 Write 437 Mixed 356 SusWrite 344 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 90.7 4K Mixed 39.5 133% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 310 234% 316 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 105%
Hitachi HDN726040ALE614 4TB 4,649 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 505GB free Firmware: APGNW7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 123 126 124 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 126 Write 134 Mixed 71 SusWrite 123 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 113%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 119 103 131 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 124 Write 117 Mixed 73.3 SusWrite 122 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 101%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1.5TB free Firmware: MJAOA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 103 104 111 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 64.7 Write 97.5 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 105 51% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 92%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 961GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 136 140 136 145 136 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Read 148 Write 112 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 136 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 238% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 28,461 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 16.4 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 18.6 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z87 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 922 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Extreme4 - $224

CPU
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	274x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	244x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	114x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	67x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	29x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	28x

RAM
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	29x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	23x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $431

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16