| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160119 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 27 '19 at 23:45 |
| Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
25.4%
Poor
|
28% 44.9 Pts
|
11% 82.6 Pts
|
4% 70.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 3662) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.4%
Poor
|
24% 32.4 fps
|
26% 32 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 96 100 115 118 121 MB/s
|
26.3%
Poor
|
29% 130 MB/s
|
35% 11.8 MB/s
|
20% 29.5 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
925GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 175 185 185 184 186 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
106% 147 MB/s
|
135% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.4 3.5 3 3.6 3.5 MB/s
|
3.22%
Terrible
|
7% 6.5 MB/s
|
9% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT51264BD160B 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
20.5%
Poor
|
21% 7.27 GB/s
|
17% 5.9 GB/s
|
18% 219 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-F2A78M-HD2 Builds (Compare 248 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 30x |
| A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 27x |
| Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 27x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 28x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 22x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $88 |