| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 74% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock N68C-S UCC (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110919 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 27 '19 at 05:08 |
| Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 925-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
48.1%
Average
|
42% 64.6 Pts
|
20% 153 Pts
|
10% 162 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
74%
Very good
|
72% 93.7 fps
|
77% 94 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 150 78 80 81 81 MB/s
|
40%
Average
|
32% 144 MB/s
|
77% 24.3 MB/s
|
25% 36.2 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
23.4%
Poor
|
23% 7.97 GB/s
|
15% 5.2 GB/s
|
40% 101 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 213 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples | 18x |
| Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 17x |
| Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples | 20x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 9x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |