Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110714
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '19 at 00:54
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 72.5 2-Core 125 53% 87.9 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 209 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Zotac(19DA 730B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	4.83% Terrible	Lighting 5.77 Reflection 6.69 Parallax 7.47 5% 6.64 fps	MRender 3.71 Gravity 7.23 Splatting 7.09 5% 6.01 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.83% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB 17,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 414GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 119 102 121 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 132 Write 135 Mixed 65.1 SusWrite 111 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 76%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB 3,370 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 117GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 19 16 15 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 17.9 Mixed 18.1 SusWrite 14.9 26% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 71% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 117%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB 8,778 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 5.3 6.6 5.5 6.4 5.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	6.84% Terrible	Read 19.9 Write 12.2 Mixed 11.9 SusWrite 6 15% 12.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.9 98% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.84% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5273DH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 16JTF51264AZ-1G4H ID:80 CE M378B5273DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5273DH0-CH9 52GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31% Below average	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 13.9 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	53x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	41x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	11x
ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 44GBUnknownBench 39%, 12 samples	11x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	9x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16