Asrock H81M-HDS R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-HDS R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141209
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '19 at 23:37
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 91.5 1-Core 116 2-Core 205 80% 137 Pts	4-Core 385 8-Core 566 59% 476 Pts	64-Core 565 35% 565 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% EVGA(3842 1071) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3670 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 115 Parallax 122 101% 120 fps	MRender 168 Gravity 125 Splatting 97.7 103% 130 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 153 153 148 147 148 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Read 443 Write 430 Mixed 331 SusWrite 180 78% 346 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 89.4 4K Mixed 50.2 164% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 358 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 175GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 67 69 80 76 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 59 Write 42 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 74.7 41% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.1 28% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.9% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 16.8 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-HDS R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS R2.0

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	108x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	56x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	36x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	33x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	13x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
GR1600D364L11/8G 2x8GBGoodramBench 52%, 992 samples	14x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	14x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16