Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 104 2-Core 208 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 592 59% 478 Pts	64-Core 593 37% 593 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Quadro P4000 with Max-Q Design 39 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Clevo(1558 9501) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1501 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.75 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Lighting 70.3 Reflection 66.9 Parallax 67.4 57% 68.2 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 64.8 Splatting 68.6 56% 67.7 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 58%
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Clevo(1558 9501) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4849 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	4.53% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 65.9 Parallax 4.69 4% 25.1 fps	MRender 7.29 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 9.35 6% 6.92 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.53% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 510 254 251 251 247 246 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	159% Outstanding	Read 1734 Write 1,344 Mixed 509 SusWrite 293 214% 970 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 87.4 4K Mixed 46.4 161% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 551 DQ Write 417 DQ Mixed 498 368% 488 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 716GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 116 119 117 122 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 90.3 Write 98 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 119 67% 91.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.6 171% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.M16FB 2x16GB 329 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 24.7 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 23.1 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	4x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2x
Quadro P4000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 54%, 39 samples	1x
Quadro P3000NvidiaBench 40%, 1,198 samples	1x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	2x
Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $95Bench 247%, 17,877 samples	1x
860 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 100%, 26,055 samples	1x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GBSamsungBench 75%, 7,581 samples	2x
M4S16S681LJJJ43-12 2x16GBUnknownBench 74%, 76 samples	1x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x8GBCorsairBench 77%, 1,612 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16