Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 133% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 168% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	382% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '19 at 02:41
Run Duration	332 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7960X-$347 2,322 User benchmarks, average bench 83% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Memory 83.8 1-Core 128 2-Core 226 82% 146 Pts	4-Core 523 8-Core 1,043 92% 783 Pts	64-Core 2847 176% 2847 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 866B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	145% Outstanding	Lighting 182 Reflection 243 Parallax 265 148% 230 fps	MRender 266 Gravity 233 Splatting 149 170% 216 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 881GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2185 1849 2098 2130 2175 2174 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	382% Outstanding	Read 2,626 Write 2322 Mixed 1,606 SusWrite 2,102 486% 2,164 MB/s	4K Read 61.2 4K Write 218 4K Mixed 92 326% 124 MB/s	DQ Read 1,170 DQ Write 1,007 DQ Mixed 1,083 813% 1,087 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 382% Great: 425%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 462GB free Firmware: RVT22B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 901 505 513 507 394 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 126%
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160 3,427 User benchmarks, average bench 440% 261GB free Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1714 1494 1521 1597 1609 1587 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	491% Outstanding	Read 2,227 Write 1825 Mixed 2,017 SusWrite 1,587 430% 1,914 MB/s	4K Read 260 4K Write 231 4K Mixed 244 829% 245 MB/s	DQ Read 1,160 DQ Write 983 DQ Mixed 1,056 795% 1,066 MB/s
Poor: 302% ↑ This bench: 491% Great: 559%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 539GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 159 157 158 157 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 152 Mixed 105 SusWrite 158 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 240% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 791GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 104 108 108 108 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 118 Write 95.2 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 107 72% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 176 178 178 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 164 Mixed 98 SusWrite 176 114% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 109%
Samsung Type-C 257GB 242 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 239GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 25 24 27 24 26 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 41 Write 31 Mixed 33 SusWrite 22.9 42% 32 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 6.1 552% 7.63 MB/s	DQ Read 9.7 DQ Write 9.9 DQ Mixed 6.8 604% 8.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMD16GX4M2B3733C17 CMD16GX4M2A2666C15 CMD16GX4M2B3733C17 CMD16GX4M2A2666C15 CMD32GX4M4A2666C15 CMD32GX4M4A2666C15 CMD32GX4M4A2666C15 CMD32GX4M4A2666C15 64GB 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	122% Outstanding	MC Read 42 MC Write 63.6 MC Mixed 42.3 141% 49.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 12.1 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	493x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	260x
Core i7-7740XIntel $281Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	148x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	168x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	92x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	60x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	55x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $795

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16