Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '19 at 12:22
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3770-$230
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
61.3% Good
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 195
69% 146 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 515
55% 429 Pts
64-Core 526
35% 526 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$170
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.17
Relative performance (0th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Lighting 95.2
Reflection 101
Parallax 109
25% 102 fps
MRender 87.2
Gravity 118
Splatting 95.5
32% 100 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$110
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 196 243 157 102 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 483
Write 432
Mixed 340
SusWrite 170
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 23.5
110% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 30
74% 160 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$90
724GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 131 124 127 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 182
Write 190
Mixed 29
SusWrite 128
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
308GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 135 141 132 134 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 154
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 136
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
257% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$74
2TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 145 152 141 147 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 162
Write 164
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 146
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 98%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
585GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 88 83 85 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 94.8
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 85
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 102%
Disk drive 1TB
884GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 61 57 59 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.3% Poor
Read 64.8
Write 53.8
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 59
64% 49.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 14,399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $481
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $73
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback