Asus M2A-VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M2A-VM  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '19 at 04:17
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 36.3
2-Core 75
39% 59.3 Pts
4-Core 75.7
8-Core 75.4
10% 75.6 Pts
64-Core 71.9
4% 71.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5830
Sapphire(174B E177) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 16.9
15% 15.9 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 14.3
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1025A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 173 165 176 169 171 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.5% Average
Read 227
Write 204
Mixed 201
SusWrite 171
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 23.4
87% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 19.4
DQ Write 40.2
DQ Mixed 24.2
20% 27.9 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 115%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
16GB free
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 71 76 70 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 64
Write 70.5
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 69.7
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 42%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 1603
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Read 12.4
Write 2
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 2.5
6% 5.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 6%
Kingston DT 101 II 8GB
7GB free, PID 1625
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.9 6.2 6.3 6.3 5.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Read 21.1
Write 5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.8
10% 9.02 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2A-VM Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2A-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $29
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback