Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	78.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Memory 94.2 1-Core 126 2-Core 248 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 619 67% 531 Pts	64-Core 851 53% 851 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Acer(1025 1243) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.92 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Lighting 96.8 Reflection 115 Parallax 95.3 79% 102 fps	MRender 90.7 Gravity 92.2 Splatting 98.1 77% 93.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 82%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 900GB free Firmware: JU001J Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 134 Write 71.8 Mixed 52.2 63% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.6 208% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB 6,230 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	83% Excellent	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 23.1 83% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 26.4 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	578x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	3x

SSD
HFS256GD9MNE-6200A 256GBBench 190%, 1,347 samples	51x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	40x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	39x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 6,230 samples	128x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	109x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	59x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16