HP OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-0XX

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	82.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-0XX (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 81B6
Memory	4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171206
Uptime	11.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '19 at 19:47
Run Duration	276 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	38%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 119 2-Core 215 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 638 59% 494 Pts	64-Core 659 41% 659 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.7% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 113 Parallax 104 85% 107 fps	MRender 93.6 Gravity 96.8 Splatting 96.6 78% 95.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB 3,288 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW74H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 356 355 329 361 337 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 1,286 Write 766 Mixed 570 SusWrite 356 165% 745 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 86.4 4K Mixed 39.4 147% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 753 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 374 309% 458 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 237%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 66GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 202 224 238 181 274 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 428 Write 178 Mixed 207 SusWrite 223 57% 259 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 21.3 78% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 64.4 DQ Mixed 89.7 89% 150 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 86%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 167 172 163 170 159 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Read 150 Write 166 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 166 95% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 108%
Hitachi HCS5C2020ALA632 2TB 1,802 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 153GB free Firmware: ML6OA5M0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 75 72 73 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 62.2 Write 53.5 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 72.6 41% 56 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 75%
WD My Passport 0810 1TB 5,284 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 360GB free, PID 0810 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 79 77 80 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 81.7 Write 81.8 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 78 98% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 45%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 6GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.5 4 3.4 3.8 3.8 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	3.95% Terrible	Read 16 Write 2.5 Mixed 5 SusWrite 3.6 7% 6.78 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.95% Great: 7%
Kingston HyperX Fury 3.0 16GB 753 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 7GB free, PID 16a5 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 44 43 44 42 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 104 Write 35.5 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 43.1 58% 51.2 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.9 82% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB 20,415 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 19.9 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 17.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-0XX Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

System: HP OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-0XX

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	113x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	9x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	50x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	8x

SSD
MZVPV256HDGL-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 192%, 3,288 samples	33x
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	27x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	6x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 4x8GBHynixBench 76%, 2,034 samples	59x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	27x
RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 4x8GBRamaxelBench 71%, 222 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $580

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16