Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-9000e APU (2016 M.SR) 3,540 User benchmarks, average bench 26% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Memory 37.7 1-Core 17.3 2-Core 23.9 19% 26.3 Pts	4-Core 22.7 8-Core 23.2 3% 23 Pts	64-Core 27.5 2% 27.5 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 37%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS 541010B7E610 1TB 193 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 766GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 98 96 99 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 111 Write 103 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 98.2 68% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.3 140% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown D4R16GS24A8R 1x16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 4.5 13% 4.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 4 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 213 19% 213 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200UAMDBench 45%, 15,631 samples	101x
A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2GAMDBench 29%, 2,523 samples	88x
Ryzen 5 2500UAMDBench 49%, 61,910 samples	60x

GPU
RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 5%, 18,674 samples	97x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,360 samples	88x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	60x

SSD
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	27x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	18x
WR202I0064G E70290F5 63GBBHTBench 18%, 327 samples	12x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	72x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 32%, 18,494 samples	27x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	21x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16