HP t520 Flexible Series TC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP t520 Flexible Series TC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 21EF
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '19 at 18:44
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD GX-212JC SOC R2E Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
26.6% Poor
Memory 48.6
1-Core 20.6
2-Core 29.9
24% 33 Pts
4-Core 27.1
8-Core 37.4
4% 32.2 Pts
64-Core 41.8
3% 41.8 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 21EF) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 13.302.1501.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 2.73
Parallax 1.38
1% 1.74 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.39
2% 1.74 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
16gb SAT A Flash Drive 16GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SFDK
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 692
Write 480
Mixed 631
134% 601 MB/s
4K Read 118
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 101
358% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 116
103% 154 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t520 Flexible Series TC Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP t520 Flexible Series TC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback