Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '19 at 23:22
Run Duration342 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 155
54% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 635
58% 483 Pts
64-Core 799
49% 799 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 46.1
Reflection 44.9
Parallax 43.9
38% 45 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 36.7
32% 39 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 129 107 133 135 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 168
Write 187
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 130
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 114%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
2.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 168 171 171 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
1TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 128 122 123 127 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 133
Write 93
Mixed 69
SusWrite 123
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 96%
WD WD7500AACS-00D6B0 750GB
18GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 37 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 39.5
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 38.9
27% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 46%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
975GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.8 10 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 23.3
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 10
27% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 59%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
1TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 25
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 10.2
29% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS723030ALA640 3TB
1TB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 24.8
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 10.3
29% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
92% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 20%
Hitachi HDS723030ALA640 3TB
1TB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 11 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 24.3
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 10.3
29% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 20%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
346GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 24 24 24 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 24.3
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 23.9
33% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 41
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 13.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $357
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback