Gigabyte GA-P75-D3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P75-D3  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '19 at 19:25
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-2600-$292
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
54.4% Above average
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 185
66% 139 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 441
48% 371 Pts
64-Core 447
30% 447 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 63%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N500 120GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 29 42 14 43 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 429
Write 362
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 43.2
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 0.5
31% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 87.8
DQ Mixed 1
17% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 86%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$38
441GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 93 92 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 65
Write 56
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 91.6
42% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
71% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GA-P75-D3 Builds (Compare 1,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop 63%
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P75-D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $502
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143AMD RX 580 $167Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $196Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback