Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171226
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '19 at 16:02
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-7600K-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
1-Core 136
2-Core 269
96% 203 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 521
69% 509 Pts
64-Core 518
35% 518 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Lighting 77.4
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 99.8
20% 80 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 92.2
Splatting 57.4
26% 73.2 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 26%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$107
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 428 421 430 407 424 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 484
Mixed 392
SusWrite 426
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 60.7
204% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
217GB free
Firmware: AM003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 90.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 90.7
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 62%
WD WD2500LPCX-24C6HT0 250GB
224GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 86 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 82.3
Write 80
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 88.5
50% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$40
698GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 121 121 121 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 66
SusWrite 120
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 67%
WD My Book 500GB
251GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 43 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 37.7
Write 35.7
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 41.8
49% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLE4G4D30AEEA.K8FE 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
56.1% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 51.3
78% 51.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 105%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 17,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,053
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $229Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $339Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback