HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '19 at 22:18
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 158
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 620
55% 467 Pts
64-Core 806
50% 806 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2382) ≥ 4GB; EVGA RTX 2080 Ti XC 11GB v418.81
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 110
Reflection 174
Parallax 177
90% 154 fps
MRender 272
Gravity 226
Splatting 148
169% 215 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 113%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
578GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 341 347 336 338 342 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 418
Mixed 364
SusWrite 343
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 37.1
125% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 238
181% 244 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
191GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 373 367 360 354 352 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 467
Mixed 405
SusWrite 363
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 42.9
141% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 225
176% 244 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 124%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
4TB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 210 209 207 207 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 130
Write 204
Mixed 158
SusWrite 210
130% 175 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
377% 3 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
732GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 212 213 211 212 214 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 213 216 208 218 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 228
Write 233
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 216
140% 193 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 1
276% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 128%
Great: 121%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235
3TB free
Firmware: 0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 187 187 184 190 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 213
Mixed 95.3
SusWrite 187
128% 175 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1
270% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 113%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 33.2
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11.1
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback