Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver J5005 2,202 User benchmarks, average bench 40% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	36.3% Below average	Memory 41.8 1-Core 57.8 2-Core 114 40% 71.1 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 171 24% 175 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605 14,651 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5017 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	2.21% Terrible	Lighting 3.07 Reflection 2.46 Parallax 1.53 2% 2.35 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 3.67 Splatting 0.09 2% 2.28 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.21% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Foresee 128GB SSD 128GB 2,750 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.33 SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 330 301 298 300 214 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 312 Write 276 Mixed 263 SusWrite 294 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 8.2 72% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 26.5 63% 128 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 10.6 28% 9.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	9x
Pentium Silver J5005IntelBench 40%, 2,202 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	9x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	1x

SSD
128GB SSD 128GBForeseeBench 59%, 2,750 samples	4x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	3x
860 EVO mSATA 500GBSamsungBench 96%, 1,650 samples	2x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x1.5GBABCDBench 24%, 1,884 samples	9x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16