Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 76.2 1-Core 116 2-Core 234 78% 142 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 657 66% 536 Pts	64-Core 928 57% 928 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 3755) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3552 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.2% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 109 Parallax 100 88% 106 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 91.9 Splatting 79.5 79% 99.7 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 9.2 60 25 105 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	48.1% Average	Read 433 Write 286 Mixed 206 SusWrite 70.2 55% 249 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 37.5 4K Mixed 18.5 72% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 78.9 DQ Mixed 41 46% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 53%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 194 195 195 194 194 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 202 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 194 110% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 2x8GB 1,789 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	80% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 27.3 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 24.6 SC Mixed 22.4 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 87.9 46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16