Zoostorm 7200-0089A

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Zoostorm 7200-0089A (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte H81M-S2V
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150810
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '19 at 16:33
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3260 9,453 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Memory 92.1 1-Core 91.1 2-Core 102 63% 95 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 161 18% 140 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Lighting 21.2 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 20.1 17% 19.5 fps	MRender 18.2 Gravity 21.1 Splatting 22.7 17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 128GB-$74 9,892 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 166 171 174 173 173 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Read 474 Write 183 Mixed 230 SusWrite 166 58% 263 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 40.8 156% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 163 140% 210 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 89%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 872GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 174 175 179 179 178 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 172 Mixed 93.2 SusWrite 173 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 73,650 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1596 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 18 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 18.1 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-0089A Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Zoostorm 7200-0089A

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x

RAM
16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 2x8GBMicronBench 56%, 1,022 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Zoostorm 7200-0089A

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Zoostorm 7200-0089A

Feedback

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)