Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Memory 16.8 1-Core 43.4 2-Core 76.9 24% 45.7 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 128 15% 118 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2067) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.76% Terrible	Lighting 1.93 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.16 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 3.17 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.76% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Generic MassStorageClass 64GB 1,679 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 41GB free, PID 0749 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 16 15 16 15 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 58.7 Write 16.3 Mixed 15 SusWrite 14.8 28% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.2 52% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
A-DA AM1L16BC2N1-BQHS 1x2GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 6.1 18% 6.17 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.73 GB/s	Latency 345 12% 345 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	127x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	124x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	3x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	8x

RAM
99U5469-045.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 43%, 788 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	6x
99U5469-045.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 22%, 1,714 samples	5x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $32

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16