Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 70.4 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 78% 144 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 699 72% 583 Pts	64-Core 930 58% 930 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 293 293 293 293 292 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 471 Mixed 452 SusWrite 302 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 61.3 196% 69.8 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 369 278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 128%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 32GB 172 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 22GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 3.5 4.1 4.9 4.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	6% Terrible	Read 18 Write 11.6 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 4.7 10% 9.02 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.6 53% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	81% Excellent	MC Read 31 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 27.3 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.5 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 104%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	1,285x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	982x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	980x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	930x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	593x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	425x

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $437

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16