Biostar H110MHC

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar H110MHC (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170630
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '19 at 18:51
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 196 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 305 41% 305 Pts	64-Core 300 19% 300 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Biostar(1565 3111) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.19% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 5.31 Parallax 3.66 4% 4.41 fps	MRender 6.86 Gravity 3.27 Splatting 9.35 6% 6.49 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.19% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84E1) 2GB CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 15.7 Parallax 18.6 16% 18.1 fps	MRender 24.5 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 15.4 16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 53 59 55 40 50 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 406 Write 69 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 49.5 28% 133 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 33.7 4K Mixed 18 74% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 55.3 DQ Mixed 36.7 40% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 55%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 361GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 108 Write 128 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 90.3 73% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB 7,811 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	67.4% Good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 20.4 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 22.9 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 65.1 61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110MHC Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H110MHC

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	66x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	43x
Pentium G4400Intel $45Bench 47%, 36,432 samples	28x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	33x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	25x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	12x
S700 250GBHP $46Bench 66%, 9,815 samples	7x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	8x
UDIMM DDR4 2400 C17 1x4GBCrucial $15Bench 39%, 4,926 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16