Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3680-$180 6,658 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 168 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 463 50% 400 Pts	64-Core 509 32% 509 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4800 2,114 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 0594) 1.5GB Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 341.96 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	7.16% Terrible	Lighting 9.6 Reflection 8.73 Parallax 4.25 8% 7.53 fps	MRender 8.71 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 6.13 6% 7.35 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.16% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 329GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AJ1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 116 Write 44.5 Mixed 60.5 55% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 40GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	51.2% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 20.2 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 11 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 61.1 65% 61.1 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16