Asrock Z370M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z370M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170913
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '19 at 02:32
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 249
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 731
76% 612 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.5% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 112
Parallax 118
93% 115 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 79.7
82% 104 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,974
Write 1,299
Mixed 610
284% 1,295 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 62.7
234% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,323
DQ Write 1,089
DQ Mixed 895
755% 1,102 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 105 111 112 112 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 139
Write 134
Mixed 66
SusWrite 110
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
210% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
1TB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 85 85 89 86 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
2TB free
Firmware: CC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 138 139 143 143 145 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 90%
USB Flash Drive 32GB
29GB free, PID 5598
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 4.8 3.7 5 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Read 26.2
Write 9
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4
13% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 2.3
98% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 659 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M-ITX/ac - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $556
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback