Asus X705UQ

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus X705UQ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X705UQ
Memory	2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170714
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '19 at 00:14
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%
CPU Throttled	93%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7500U 139,101 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 109 2-Core 184 76% 128 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 268 38% 278 Pts	64-Core 287 18% 287 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia 940MX 36,213 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 148E) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1891 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Lighting 13.4 Reflection 10.1 Parallax 11.7 11% 11.7 fps	MRender 12.8 Gravity 13.3 Splatting 8.78 9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB 50,765 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 393 400 415 425 411 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Read 352 Write 149 Mixed 332 SusWrite 399 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 92.1 4K Mixed 35.1 122% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 307 222% 285 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 91%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: SDM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 127 128 128 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 123 Write 139 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 127 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.4% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 10.1 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 11.6 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X705UQ Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X705UQ

CPU
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	5x
Core i3-7100UIntelBench 43%, 37,239 samples	3x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	6x
940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 36,213 samples	2x

SSD
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	2x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	2x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5644EB0-CPB M471A5244CB0-CRC 6GBSamsungBench 50%, 100 samples	2x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	2x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16