Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5620 3,527 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Memory 75.7 1-Core 46.4 2-Core 102 47% 74.6 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 158 19% 144 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 67%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32% Below average	Lighting 41.1 Reflection 27.9 Parallax 34.3 34% 34.4 fps	MRender 35.6 Gravity 37.8 Splatting 33.3 29% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 33%
ATI FirePro V4800 (FireGL V) 1,889 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 2306) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.93% Terrible	Lighting 7.23 Reflection 8.23 Parallax 5.94 6% 7.13 fps	MRender 7.76 Gravity 5.03 Splatting 8.65 6% 7.15 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.93% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK128MAY-1AH1ZABHA 128GB 1,012 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: M504 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 214 221 214 222 222 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.2% Average	Read 222 Write 215 Mixed 188 SusWrite 213 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 18.9 62% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 165 128% 176 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 414GB free Firmware: CC37 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 126 130 130 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 34.7 Write 57.7 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 127 44% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.3 76% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4G1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4G1 40GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 14.5 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	297x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	272x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	251x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16