Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics68.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A79XTD EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100319
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 23:02
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 99.7
50% 77.4 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 281
29% 235 Pts
64-Core 282
18% 282 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.1% Good
Lighting 74.5
Reflection 107
Parallax 104
61% 95.2 fps
MRender 98.4
Gravity 98.4
Splatting 103
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ts1tssd3 70 1TB
464GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 154 152 155 140 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.2% Average
Read 250
Write 213
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 142
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 26.4
79% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 102
82% 114 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 106%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
203GB free
Firmware: X610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 154 153 155 140 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.5% Above average
Read 243
Write 213
Mixed 182
SusWrite 142
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 30.3
108% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 116
90% 123 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 121%
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
32GB free
Firmware: Z220
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 154 153 154 134 99 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.6% Average
Read 239
Write 166
Mixed 160
SusWrite 142
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 12
77% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 44.9
52% 90 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 71%
WD My Book 1230 2TB
1TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 24
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 21.1
32% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 59%
Kingston DT 101 G2 4GB
4GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.4 2.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Read 19
Write 1.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 2.3
6% 6.77 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback