Gigabyte H370M D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H370M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte H370M D3H (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180213
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '19 at 20:38
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	94%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	65% Good	Memory 66.9 1-Core 93.6 2-Core 187 65% 116 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 422 50% 387 Pts	64-Core 364 22% 364 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372B) 2GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.70 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28% Poor	Lighting 34.5 Reflection 24.7 Parallax 25.6 28% 28.2 fps	MRender 36 Gravity 32.9 Splatting 32.9 28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 549GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 119 129 129 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 160 Write 140 Mixed 73.9 SusWrite 121 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 195GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 92 94 94 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 111 Write 104 Mixed 69.8 SusWrite 92.6 69% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 1x8GB 5,399 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 7.2 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 9.1 23% 8.13 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H370M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte H370M D3H - $95

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	139x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	133x
Core i5-9400FIntel $101Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	42x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	32x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	14x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	19x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	15x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $460

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16