Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 13:19
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 133
2-Core 250
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 708
77% 610 Pts
64-Core 735
46% 735 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.81
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 43% Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 9.7 96 8.2 65 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 497
Write 272
Mixed 411
SusWrite 97.5
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 1.1
47% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 0.3
18% 48.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
180GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 171 172 166 161 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 139
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 167
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
1.5TB free
Firmware: MK7ONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 112 111 107 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 69
Write 71.8
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 111
54% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 83%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
2TB free, PID 0715
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 180 182 178 183 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 49
Write 80
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 179
122% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.4
220% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 KHX2400C15D4/4G Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 26
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 24.9
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $655
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback