Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181208
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '19 at 11:19
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 79.3 1-Core 114 2-Core 226 78% 140 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 698 70% 571 Pts	64-Core 930 58% 930 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 3413) CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Lighting 70.4 Reflection 67.2 Parallax 92.8 57% 76.8 fps	MRender 65.8 Gravity 69.7 Splatting 55 51% 63.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 299 309 290 320 310 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 332 Mixed 389 SusWrite 322 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 51.1 182% 65.4 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 357 270% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
PNY XLR8 120GB-$150 48 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 68GB free Firmware: 502ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 168 95 95 95 96 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 302 Write 221 Mixed 251 SusWrite 123 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 87.4 4K Mixed 30.5 128% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 206 168% 239 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 39%
WD WD1500BLFS-01YBU0 150GB 168 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 136GB free Firmware: 04.04V02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 93 94 94 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 112 Write 104 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 93.8 71% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.3 236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 68%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB 39,407 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 829GB free Firmware: SC23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 160 158 158 156 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Read 133 Write 140 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 158 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 98%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 20GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 10 7.7 11 9.2 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 153 Write 20.8 Mixed 51.2 SusWrite 15 60% 60 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.8 167% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 42.8 MC Write 39.6 MC Mixed 33.8 111% 38.7 GB/s	SC Read 24.5 SC Write 40.4 SC Mixed 28.5 89% 31.1 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)